New Real Estate Introduction Letter

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MILITARY EDUCATION FANB

publish analysis of the Simon Rodriguez Movement Educators Comprehensive Education Plan Military

Two things before we issue our initial trial before the controversial Military Education Plan . Education is long-standing military in our country, with an option for citizens who wish to enter the military. Has and has had its own operating structure has and has had Military High Schools and Institutes of Higher Education. Nothing new here. The other is the implementation in the government of Rafael Caldera of the subject "Pre-military education" in the middle school level and diversified. At the time PROVEA demanded the annulment of the obligation of this subject without success. Therefore still has the same. Resolution 17621 of the Ministry of Defence published in the Official Gazette No. 39641 dated 24 March 2011 puts into effect the "Comprehensive Plan for Education Military FANB" and aims, we quote verbatim ... "make (...) the policies of the educational activities of military education mode "(emphasis added).

Now Organic Education Law in its article 24 says that the education system is "structured and composed of subsystems, levels and modalities," Military Education being established as a mode, defined as "educational alternatives for the care of people by their characteristics and specific conditions of their overall development, cultural, ethnic, linguistic and others, require curricular adaptations "... and in Article 30 of the LOE precise and limited in scope and more on that later.

's reading of the contested decision concluded that the drafters of it made a very particular and accommodating interpretation of various rules say nothing about an alleged power and interference of the fanbase in the development of policies, plans and curricula aimed at education levels in the LOE defined in Article 25 (Early Childhood Education, Primary and Middle), plus the subsystem of higher education, observed along the same, important contradictions that make it irrelevant at least in the levels of formal education.

At first resolution established the scope of it when he says that is "to formulate the policies of the educational activities of the educational mode military ", as already cited. So even there you get your scope and can not be implemented this plan beyond high schools and colleges of the fanbase, therefore, reiterate, it defines the purpose of the aforesaid resolution. So that the other articles related to levels of formal education mentioned above are invalidated. On the other hand the resolution violates the principle of competition laid down in Article 26 of the Organic Law of Central Administration: "All powers given to agencies and entities of public administration will be binding upon and exercised under the conditions, Limits and procedures, be irrevocable, non-delegable, non-extendable and can not be relaxed by any convention, except as expressly provided in the laws. "

therefore can not the Ministry of Defence invade a function that is delegated or renounced the two Ministries of Education guidelines on such as setting policies, plans, programs of study and curricula in their respective areas. Is allowed only to the Ministry of defense, planning and directing educational policy in military. Thus it is exhaustive and unequivocally laid down in Article 30 of the LOE when he says: "Education military role is to guide the process of training, upgrading and development of male and female members of the Bolivarian National Armed Force (...). The governing body with jurisdiction over defense, exercise military-style education, as such plans ... and ... formulating policies and curriculum plans to ensure quality education in the Bolivarian National Armed Force (...) The military education is exercised in coordination with the competent authority in the field of Higher Education. " (Emphasis added.) We conclude that from the standpoint of legal and formal resolution No. 17,621 issued by the Ministry of Defence can not be applied in schools, colleges or universities that make up the levels of education. Is only valid according to its purpose and the provisions of LOE own in articles 24 and 30, in educational institutions of the military

should not confuse the fanbase and reductionist interpretations of the real and true meaning of defense the sovereignty of the homeland and its integrity, it is one thing the military defense of the nation and the other is to develop a sense of patriotism, national identity and defense of sovereignty from the scope of the whole society. And this task is that historically have been carrying Venezuelan educators because the notion of patriotism and national identity are learned in schools without the need for military training. For a simple and irrefutable reason: The love of country and their identity is not an asset of the barracks, it belongs to all Venezuelans. This disqualifies plan and know the country that work life has been making the glorious Venezuelan educators. This can not and must admit it because it is an assault on our work and effort that we make daily in all schools and colleges in the country. Finally, we believe that this problem should not deviate from the inconvenience of it is the militia that tried to run the Comprehensive Plan of Military Education. Simply no component the FANB should apply in formal education for the reasons outlined above.